云上的日子
1，費拿拉小鎮，工程師斯瓦諾（KimRossiStuart飾）邂逅了女教師卡門（Ineacute;sSastre飾），他們一見鐘情，卡門卻拒絕了斯瓦諾的吻。當他們三年后再次相遇時，斯瓦諾則在肉欲面前止步；2，海濱小城，某導演（JohnMalkovich飾）信步游蕩時遇到了美麗的女子（SophieMarceau蘇菲bull;瑪索飾）。她向導演坦白曾親手殺害自己的父親。他們并未因此疏遠，反而繾綣纏綿；3，巴黎，妻子離開不忠的丈夫，尋找租房時遇到了失去妻子的卡羅（JeanReno讓bull;雷諾飾），他們似乎找到了共通的心緒；4，英俊的男孩愛上了一個姑娘（Iregrave;neJacob飾），他尾隨、表白，卻得知她將要把自己獻給上帝。本片榮獲1996年意大利電影新聞記者協會銀絲帶獎最佳編曲、1995年威尼斯電影節費比西獎。
在線看
同款熱播
雛菊2006
全智賢,鄭雨盛,李成宰,姜大衛,林迪安阿姆斯特丹，兩個男人愛上了同一個女人，注定了一段糾纏的故事。惠瑛（全智賢飾）是畫家，每天到廣場幫路人畫肖像，而像她一樣風雨不改的，還有某人送來的一盤雛菊。每天雛菊總是準時送到，讓她心里悸動而好奇。一天，匆匆而過的正佑(李成宰 飾)遇上了畫家。他本是國際警察，來這個城市追捕殺手，然而卻迷上了溫婉動人的惠瑛，他讓惠瑛幫他描肖像，他們的愛情在萌發盛開。這些情景，送花人看在眼里，痛在心里。他的身份注定了他必須給正佑讓出位置，對惠瑛默默付出。因為，他就是正佑所尋找的殺手樸義(鄭宇成 飾)。但是，強烈的愛終究讓他不再躲在暗處，他決心爭取幸福。二人在法律上，感情上的鮮明對立，注定了不能完滿的結局，鮮血在惠瑛描有雛菊的花布上蔓延開來……
全境災變
伊芙·詹姆斯 Eve James,坎農·史密斯 Kannon Smith,萊琳·麥克 Lelyn Mac在一場死亡率不是1%，而是98%左右的疫情之后，艾莉離開了她的街區，到了一個新的城市，在那里她遇到了奎恩，一個對新世界有獨特生存之道的人。
掃惡
潘斌龍,包貝爾,趙潤南,克拉拉,周大勇,郭子恒,侯浩然,于柏林,釋小龍,湯鎮業,九孔,常鋮千禧時代質感的動作犯罪類型，奇葩刑警隊長與背負殺父之仇的少年聯手追緝重出江湖的殺人劫車團伙，刺激爽感中不乏社會思考和感動。
毛骨悚然撞鬼經 2006夏季特別篇
伊藤淳史,夏川純,堀北真希,桐谷美玲,高島政伸,溫水洋一,釋由美子,巖佐真悠子,大島美幸,村上知子,平岡祐太,柴田理惠《在斷崖下》：青年蒲岡大輝（伊藤淳史 飾）將車停在懸崖旁和女友幽會，突然一股神秘的力量將汽車推向懸崖；《6號房間》：女高中生久保有紗（堀北真希 飾）和長澤美奈子等朋友去唱卡拉OK，自從她們使用過詭異的6號房間后，美奈子就變得分外怪異；《不可思議的時間》：為了趕上即將進行的世界杯比賽轉播，小職員白石大吾（平岡祐太 飾）匆匆搭上一輛計程車，卻在很短的時間內經歷了一段漫長的旅程；《四疊半的貴婦人》：森三中的大島美幸買到一只精致的茶杯，隨茶杯一同來到她家的還有一個身穿洋裝的貴婦人；《體驗者》：市場調研人員今泉誠一（高島政伸 飾）在某超市調查期間，發現店員似乎正被某個看不見的女人所侵擾；《病棟的絨毛玩具》：某所醫院有一只泰迪熊毛絨玩具，所有把玩它的老人都回去世。
大熊
亞當·布羅迪,泰勒·萊伯恩,巴勃羅·施瑞博爾,托比·哈斯,喬伊·科恩,扎克里·奈頓,Heidi HeasletBIG BEAR is about Joe (Joey Kern) who reluctantly has his bachelor party even though his fiancé just dumped him for some Dude (recent Emmy nominated. Pablo Schreiber).
等待方舟
耶日·斯圖爾,克里斯提娜·楊達,卡里娜·謝魯斯克,馬里烏什·德莫霍夫斯基,馬雷克·瓦爾切夫斯基,揚·諾維茨基,亨里克·比斯塔,萊昂·涅姆奇克,克茲佐夫·馬扎克,斯坦尼斯瓦夫·伊加爾Set in an underground dungeon inhabited by bundled, ragged human beings, after the nuclear holocaust. The story follows the wanderings of a hero through the situations of survival. People wait for the Ark to arrive and rescue them while their habitat falls apart. Delving deep into the dusty and long abandonded vaults of b-cinema in search of lost gems always leaves me with a bittersweet taste. On one hand the discovery of unexpected gems where no one would think them possible is a rewarding experience. On the other hand though it makes one wonder how many of these remarkable low-budget oddities, personal love affairs of directors never quite famous and now all but forgotten, have almost forever slipped from memory? n any case what we have here is a little post-apocalyptic gem from Poland that is really better than it has any right to. The dystopian near future of O-BI, O-BA finds a group of survivors of the nuclear war that ravaged the Earth inhabiting an underworld concrete bunker and biding their time as they wait for the mysterious Ark, an air ship of some kind that will come and save them. The Ark proves to be an elaborate hoax, carefully designed to give hope to the malnourished and desperate denizens of the bunker, while in the meantime the dome that separates their miserable existence from the nuclear winter outside is slowly caving in. What first striked me about the movie is the design of the bunker and the depiction of the survivors. The survivors are gaunt, filthy and terrible-looking penitents, dressed in rags and aimlessly wandering the neon-lit halls of the bunker like automatons. The bunker is a rundown, seedy place, with bright neon lights peering from all sides like the eyes of malignant beasts. On one hand it is a slightly 80's depiction of the dystopian future but the movie never stoops down to MAD MAX cheese. Instead it combines biting political satire with the bleak outlook of a world with no future, black comedy with barbs on apathy, religion and power. The survivors, for example, are fed some kind of flour dropping from a tube that hovers in the air - later on we discover the food supervisor uses books and the Bible itself as filler for this meagre meal. There are many such short symbolic touches, perhaps not life-changing or faith-restoring, yet playful, clever and inspired. One thing is for sure; O-BI, O-BA is not your run-of-the-mill sci-fi schlock. It overcomes its modest budget with creativity and has genuine artistic aspirations both from a writing and directing perspective. My opinion is that it should have been filmed in black and white instead of colour though. The director uses atmospheric light and shadow to great effect and it would have registered even better in stark black and white. The blue-green neon on the other hand outstays its welcome after a while. Just a minor gripe in an otherwise solid b-movie with its heart set in all the right places. Imagine a less bleak THE ROAD (Cormac McCarthy) being injected with the satire and humour of DR.STRANGELOVE and you're getting there. See it if you can find it.